Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?

Getting into the field, degree paths, labs, papers, internships, and career/salary discussion.
sven.smith4
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2026 3:48 pm

Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?

Post by sven.smith4 »

Tangent, but worth mentioning: How much ML background a controls role actually requires varies a lot by company and team - some whole-body control positions remain heavily classical-optimization-focused, while others increasingly expect familiarity with reinforcement learning or imitation learning even for what used to be a purely classical-controls job.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
sven.wilson4
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2026 3:27 pm

Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?

Post by sven.wilson4 »

@sven.smith4 Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well. A field-deployment or reliability engineer's day-to-day work leans much more toward diagnosing real-world failure patterns, managing spare-parts logistics, and working directly with the customer site than toward algorithm development - a genuinely different role than a lot of new grads expect going in. Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
sven.smith4
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2026 3:48 pm

Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?

Post by sven.smith4 »

@sven.wilson4 I dealt with almost this exact situation. A commonly cited skill gap in new-grad applicants is practical systems integration experience - many candidates are individually strong in ML or in mechanical design, but comparatively few have hands-on experience getting perception, planning, and control to work together reliably on real hardware under time pressure.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
ethan17
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 8:21 pm

Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?

Post by ethan17 »

Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here. Remote work remains genuinely limited for most hands-on humanoid hardware roles, given the need for physical access to robots and test environments, though software-only roles (simulation, perception algorithms, offline learning) increasingly do offer remote or hybrid arrangements. Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
rao91
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2025 1:55 am

Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?

Post by rao91 »

Speaking from personal experience here, Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.
he/him
nancy_lewi
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2025 1:11 pm

Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?

Post by nancy_lewi »

Genuinely curious - A whole-body control engineer's day-to-day work is a mix of formulating and tuning constrained optimization problems, debugging why a controller behaves differently on hardware than in simulation, and a surprising amount of time spent on numerical stability and solver performance rather than pure algorithm design. Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
barbara.jones
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2025 6:12 pm

Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?

Post by barbara.jones »

I'd frame this differently. A whole-body control engineer's day-to-day work is a mix of formulating and tuning constrained optimization problems, debugging why a controller behaves differently on hardware than in simulation, and a surprising amount of time spent on numerical stability and solver performance rather than pure algorithm design.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
byang
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2025 5:26 am

Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?

Post by byang »

That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. In the UK, base salaries for robotics roles reportedly range from around £50,000 for new graduates up to roughly £200,000 for senior whole-body-control or reinforcement-learning specialists - a notably wide band reflecting how specialized the top end of the field has become. How much ML background a controls role actually requires varies a lot by company and team - some whole-body control positions remain heavily classical-optimization-focused, while others increasingly expect familiarity with reinforcement learning or imitation learning even for what used to be a purely classical-controls job.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
garcia51
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:36 pm

Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?

Post by garcia51 »

@byang I can speak to this a bit. Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.
they/them
michaelroberts
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2026 8:34 pm

Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?

Post by michaelroberts »

@garcia51 +1 to this. Worth adding: Active employers hiring specifically for humanoid-relevant roles span both established robotics companies (Shadow Robot, Engineered Arts, PAL Robotics) and the newer venture-funded players (Figure, 1X, Apptronik, Sanctuary AI, Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas program) - each with different team sizes, cultures, and hardware-vs-software emphasis. A commonly cited skill gap in new-grad applicants is practical systems integration experience - many candidates are individually strong in ML or in mechanical design, but comparatively few have hands-on experience getting perception, planning, and control to work together reliably on real hardware under time pressure.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
Post Reply