What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Tesla Optimus, Boston Dynamics Atlas, Figure, Unitree, Agility Digit, Apptronik Apollo, 1X, and everyone else building these things.
olga_lind
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2024 12:11 pm

What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by olga_lind »

Been lurking on this one for a while, finally decided to ask. Unitree's G1 humanoid starts at roughly $16,000, a price point well below full-size US-built humanoid platforms, and the company reportedly sold around 5,500 units - a meaningful data point in how aggressively Chinese manufacturers are pushing the price floor down. Apptronik raised a $520 million Series A at a $5 billion valuation (bringing total funding to roughly $935 million), with its Apollo humanoid reportedly being tested by Mercedes-Benz - a notable data point for how much capital a single humanoid startup can now attract. Happy to be told I'm wrong on any of this.
nicole57
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:29 am

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by nicole57 »

@olga_lind Tangent, but worth mentioning: Estimated total operational commercial humanoids worldwide sit around 7,000-8,000 units as of mid-2026, broken down roughly as Optimus Gen 3 (1,000+), Unitree (5,500+ cumulative), Agility Digit (~250), Apptronik Apollo (~80), and Figure (~150) - useful context for how early-stage 'commercial scale' still is industry-wide.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
park44
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:03 am

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by park44 »

Tangent, but worth mentioning: Agility Robotics' Digit is operating in Amazon fulfillment centers and GXO warehouses moving totes, backed by a factory with roughly 10,000 units of annual production capacity - one of the more mature commercial-scale logistics deployments as of 2026. Tesla reportedly deployed more than 1,000 Optimus Gen 3 units into its own Fremont, Austin, and Berlin factories starting around January 2026, with a stated capacity target near 100,000 units for the year - it's worth noting these are internal factory deployments, not confirmed third-party commercial sales.
she/her
chenperez
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2024 3:51 pm

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by chenperez »

@park44 I'd push back on this a bit. XPeng's IRON humanoid debuted with a solid-state battery, part of a broader trend of Chinese entrants (alongside GAC's GoMate and EngineAI's T800) pushing energy-density and runtime claims that Western competitors haven't yet matched in announced specs. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
Building > buying.
matthew43
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:18 am

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by matthew43 »

@chenperez This is a great summary, thanks. Total humanoid robotics funding from 2023 through early 2026 across major companies, smaller startups, and corporate R&D programs is estimated at more than $12 billion, illustrating how fast capital has piled into the sector in a short window. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
sharonschmidt
Posts: 174
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:31 am

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by sharonschmidt »

@matthew43 To answer this directly: Automotive manufacturers - BMW, Mercedes, BYD, Geely, and Toyota among them - have become some of the most important early adopters, largely because their factories already have the structured environments and safety processes that make early humanoid deployment more tractable.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
benjaminsanchez
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:58 am

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by benjaminsanchez »

@sharonschmidt This lines up with my experience. Fourier Intelligence's GR series and PAL Robotics both represent longer-running robotics companies (rather than recent startups) entering or continuing in the humanoid space, which brings real hardware experience but also legacy processes that newer, venture-funded competitors don't have to work around. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
dubois35
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2024 12:01 pm

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by dubois35 »

I can speak to this a bit. AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players. Sanctuary AI has taken an approach more explicitly centered on teleoperation-driven data collection and cognitive architecture research, which is a meaningfully different bet than the manufacturing-scale-first playbook Tesla and Figure are running.
they/them
cynthia.muller
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2025 8:23 pm

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by cynthia.muller »

@dubois35 Counterpoint: Figure AI's robot ran on the BMW Spartanburg production line for roughly eleven months, contributing to more than 30,000 vehicle production cycles, ahead of an announced follow-on deployment at BMW's Leipzig plant. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas (launched for Hyundai factory pilots) fully replaced the older hydraulic Atlas platform's actuation with electric quasi-direct-drive joints, resulting in a quieter, lighter robot with comparable or better dynamic performance for the pilot use cases.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
kwilliams
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:57 pm

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by kwilliams »

@cynthia.muller I can speak to this a bit. Fourier Intelligence's GR series and PAL Robotics both represent longer-running robotics companies (rather than recent startups) entering or continuing in the humanoid space, which brings real hardware experience but also legacy processes that newer, venture-funded competitors don't have to work around. 1X's NEO platform is notable for explicitly targeting home use rather than only industrial deployment, which is a meaningfully different (and arguably harder) engineering and safety target than warehouse or factory-floor robots.
he/him
Post Reply