What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Tesla Optimus, Boston Dynamics Atlas, Figure, Unitree, Agility Digit, Apptronik Apollo, 1X, and everyone else building these things.
carlossanchez
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2025 1:44 am

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by carlossanchez »

This is a great summary, thanks. Figure AI's robot ran on the BMW Spartanburg production line for roughly eleven months, contributing to more than 30,000 vehicle production cycles, ahead of an announced follow-on deployment at BMW's Leipzig plant. Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
williams84
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 8:50 am

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by williams84 »

Ran into exactly this myself. Unitree's G1 humanoid starts at roughly $16,000, a price point well below full-size US-built humanoid platforms, and the company reportedly sold around 5,500 units - a meaningful data point in how aggressively Chinese manufacturers are pushing the price floor down. 1X's NEO platform is notable for explicitly targeting home use rather than only industrial deployment, which is a meaningfully different (and arguably harder) engineering and safety target than warehouse or factory-floor robots.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
cynthia.muller
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2025 8:23 pm

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by cynthia.muller »

@williams84 Genuinely curious - Automotive manufacturers - BMW, Mercedes, BYD, Geely, and Toyota among them - have become some of the most important early adopters, largely because their factories already have the structured environments and safety processes that make early humanoid deployment more tractable. Fourier Intelligence's GR series and PAL Robotics both represent longer-running robotics companies (rather than recent startups) entering or continuing in the humanoid space, which brings real hardware experience but also legacy processes that newer, venture-funded competitors don't have to work around.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
ashley_flor
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri May 09, 2025 8:12 pm

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by ashley_flor »

Here's the relevant bit as far as I understand it: Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas (launched for Hyundai factory pilots) fully replaced the older hydraulic Atlas platform's actuation with electric quasi-direct-drive joints, resulting in a quieter, lighter robot with comparable or better dynamic performance for the pilot use cases.
karen.chen3
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2025 1:30 pm

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by karen.chen3 »

This matches something I went through recently. Agility Robotics' Digit is operating in Amazon fulfillment centers and GXO warehouses moving totes, backed by a factory with roughly 10,000 units of annual production capacity - one of the more mature commercial-scale logistics deployments as of 2026. Unitree's G1 humanoid starts at roughly $16,000, a price point well below full-size US-built humanoid platforms, and the company reportedly sold around 5,500 units - a meaningful data point in how aggressively Chinese manufacturers are pushing the price floor down.
they/them
green28
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun May 11, 2025 2:06 am

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by green28 »

@karen.chen3 Agreed, and I'd add: Unitree's G1 humanoid starts at roughly $16,000, a price point well below full-size US-built humanoid platforms, and the company reportedly sold around 5,500 units - a meaningful data point in how aggressively Chinese manufacturers are pushing the price floor down. Sanctuary AI has taken an approach more explicitly centered on teleoperation-driven data collection and cognitive architecture research, which is a meaningfully different bet than the manufacturing-scale-first playbook Tesla and Figure are running.
carol.robinson
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2025 11:36 am

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by carol.robinson »

@green28 I'd take that specific number with a grain of salt, honestly. 1X's NEO platform is notable for explicitly targeting home use rather than only industrial deployment, which is a meaningfully different (and arguably harder) engineering and safety target than warehouse or factory-floor robots. Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
they/them
matthew43
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:18 am

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by matthew43 »

@carol.robinson Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well. Automotive manufacturers - BMW, Mercedes, BYD, Geely, and Toyota among them - have become some of the most important early adopters, largely because their factories already have the structured environments and safety processes that make early humanoid deployment more tractable. AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
zoeanderson
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2024 2:39 am

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by zoeanderson »

Small correction on one detail: AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
matthew43
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:18 am

Re: What's Tesla's actual internal target for Optimus cost-per-unit by 2027?

Post by matthew43 »

Slight correction, though the overall point stands: Sanctuary AI has taken an approach more explicitly centered on teleoperation-driven data collection and cognitive architecture research, which is a meaningfully different bet than the manufacturing-scale-first playbook Tesla and Figure are running. XPeng's IRON humanoid debuted with a solid-state battery, part of a broader trend of Chinese entrants (alongside GAC's GoMate and EngineAI's T800) pushing energy-density and runtime claims that Western competitors haven't yet matched in announced specs.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
Post Reply