Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off
-
scott.andersson5
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:39 pm
Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off
@rtorres Just to be precise about one thing:
Jetson-class boards remain a common choice for onboard compute on hobbyist builds needing real vision or learned-policy inference, while a Raspberry Pi is often adequate for lower-level joint control and telemetry if the heavier compute is offloaded to a base station.
-
samuel.adams
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2026 3:21 am
Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off
This matches what I've seen too.
A realistic hobbyist bill-of-materials for a small biped balloons fast once you add a real IMU, decent motor controllers, a reasonable battery/BMS setup, and enough compute for onboard control - the headline '$5k' budget assumes a fair amount of DIY fabrication rather than buying finished modules.
Building > buying.
Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off
Agreed, and I'd add:
A recurring lesson from hobbyist build logs: thermal management gets ignored until an actuator overheats and damages its own mounting hardware, at which point everyone suddenly starts caring about airflow and duty-cycle limits. Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead.
they/them
Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off
@dubois35 I can speak to this a bit.
Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead. The Berkeley Humanoid Lite stands about 1 meter tall and weighs roughly 16 kg, which is a genuinely reasonable target size for a first serious hobbyist build - big enough to be a real bipedal platform, small enough to not need industrial-scale actuators or a huge budget.
she/her
-
novikova63
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2026 8:26 pm
Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off
@lperez That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit.
A first successful unassisted walk, from a standing start on a from-scratch project, commonly takes many months of part-time weekend work even for someone with a solid mechanical and software background - it's a genuinely hard milestone, not a weekend project.
Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off
Just to be precise about one thing:
Jetson-class boards remain a common choice for onboard compute on hobbyist builds needing real vision or learned-policy inference, while a Raspberry Pi is often adequate for lower-level joint control and telemetry if the heavier compute is offloaded to a base station. Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead.
Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off
@shill Thanks for laying this out, genuinely useful.
Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead.
Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off
Side note that might be relevant:
Off-the-shelf RC servos are a reasonable starting point for a first small biped because they bundle motor, gearbox, and basic position control in one part, but they generally can't deliver the torque density or backdrivability needed to scale up to a larger, more capable build.
she/her
Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off
Sorry if this is a basic question, but
Jetson-class boards remain a common choice for onboard compute on hobbyist builds needing real vision or learned-policy inference, while a Raspberry Pi is often adequate for lower-level joint control and telemetry if the heavier compute is offloaded to a base station.
Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off
@jhansen I see it a little differently.
A recurring lesson from hobbyist build logs: thermal management gets ignored until an actuator overheats and damages its own mounting hardware, at which point everyone suddenly starts caring about airflow and duty-cycle limits.
"Torque is a lifestyle."