Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off

Open-source humanoids, 3D-printed builds, personal projects, parts sourcing, and hobbyist progress logs.
scott.andersson5
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:39 pm

Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off

Post by scott.andersson5 »

@rtorres Just to be precise about one thing: Jetson-class boards remain a common choice for onboard compute on hobbyist builds needing real vision or learned-policy inference, while a Raspberry Pi is often adequate for lower-level joint control and telemetry if the heavier compute is offloaded to a base station.
samuel.adams
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2026 3:21 am

Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off

Post by samuel.adams »

This matches what I've seen too. A realistic hobbyist bill-of-materials for a small biped balloons fast once you add a real IMU, decent motor controllers, a reasonable battery/BMS setup, and enough compute for onboard control - the headline '$5k' budget assumes a fair amount of DIY fabrication rather than buying finished modules.
Building > buying.
dubois35
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2024 12:01 pm

Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off

Post by dubois35 »

Agreed, and I'd add: A recurring lesson from hobbyist build logs: thermal management gets ignored until an actuator overheats and damages its own mounting hardware, at which point everyone suddenly starts caring about airflow and duty-cycle limits. Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead.
they/them
lperez
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2026 1:50 pm

Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off

Post by lperez »

@dubois35 I can speak to this a bit. Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead. The Berkeley Humanoid Lite stands about 1 meter tall and weighs roughly 16 kg, which is a genuinely reasonable target size for a first serious hobbyist build - big enough to be a real bipedal platform, small enough to not need industrial-scale actuators or a huge budget.
she/her
novikova63
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2026 8:26 pm

Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off

Post by novikova63 »

@lperez That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. A first successful unassisted walk, from a standing start on a from-scratch project, commonly takes many months of part-time weekend work even for someone with a solid mechanical and software background - it's a genuinely hard milestone, not a weekend project.
shill
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2025 3:09 pm

Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off

Post by shill »

Just to be precise about one thing: Jetson-class boards remain a common choice for onboard compute on hobbyist builds needing real vision or learned-policy inference, while a Raspberry Pi is often adequate for lower-level joint control and telemetry if the heavier compute is offloaded to a base station. Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead.
noah_pate
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2024 8:25 pm

Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off

Post by noah_pate »

@shill Thanks for laying this out, genuinely useful. Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead.
aliu
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2026 6:16 am

Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off

Post by aliu »

Side note that might be relevant: Off-the-shelf RC servos are a reasonable starting point for a first small biped because they bundle motor, gearbox, and basic position control in one part, but they generally can't deliver the torque density or backdrivability needed to scale up to a larger, more capable build.
she/her
jhansen
Posts: 209
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:27 am

Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off

Post by jhansen »

Sorry if this is a basic question, but Jetson-class boards remain a common choice for onboard compute on hobbyist builds needing real vision or learned-policy inference, while a Raspberry Pi is often adequate for lower-level joint control and telemetry if the heavier compute is offloaded to a base station.
greta78
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2026 8:34 pm

Re: Sharing my BOM revision after realizing my first budget was way off

Post by greta78 »

@jhansen I see it a little differently. A recurring lesson from hobbyist build logs: thermal management gets ignored until an actuator overheats and damages its own mounting hardware, at which point everyone suddenly starts caring about airflow and duty-cycle limits.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
Post Reply