Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?

End effectors, dexterous hands, tendon drives, tactile fingertips, grasp planning, and teleoperation.
park44
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:03 am

Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?

Post by park44 »

Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here. Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab. Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence. This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
she/her
servoken70
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2024 5:05 am

Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?

Post by servoken70 »

I'd push back on this a bit. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence. Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
nicole57
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:29 am

Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?

Post by nicole57 »

I see it a little differently. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
scott21
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:57 am

Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?

Post by scott21 »

@nicole57 I see it a little differently. Figure's fourth-generation Dexterous Hand (on Figure 02/03) reportedly offers 16 degrees of freedom per hand with sensors integrated into each finger, aimed at fine force control tasks like handling small electronic components without crushing them.
she/her
jhansen
Posts: 209
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:27 am

Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?

Post by jhansen »

Counterpoint: Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence. Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects.
sharonschmidt
Posts: 174
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:31 am

Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?

Post by sharonschmidt »

@jhansen Slightly off-topic, but related: In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem. Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
dchen
Posts: 182
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2024 6:51 am

Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?

Post by dchen »

@sharonschmidt That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can.
matthew43
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:18 am

Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?

Post by matthew43 »

@dchen Just to be precise about one thing: Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
camila.jackson0
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2024 1:27 am

Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?

Post by camila.jackson0 »

This matches what I've seen too. Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself.
Building > buying.
ethan_fisc
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:36 am

Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?

Post by ethan_fisc »

@camila.jackson0 This is a great summary, thanks. Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects.
Post Reply