Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?
Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?
Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here.
Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab. Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
she/her
-
servoken70
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2024 5:05 am
Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?
I'd push back on this a bit.
Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence. Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects.
Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?
I see it a little differently.
Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?
@nicole57 I see it a little differently.
Figure's fourth-generation Dexterous Hand (on Figure 02/03) reportedly offers 16 degrees of freedom per hand with sensors integrated into each finger, aimed at fine force control tasks like handling small electronic components without crushing them.
she/her
Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?
Counterpoint:
Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence. Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects.
-
sharonschmidt
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:31 am
Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?
@jhansen Slightly off-topic, but related:
In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem. Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?
@sharonschmidt That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit.
Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can.
Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?
@dchen Just to be precise about one thing:
Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects.
Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
-
camila.jackson0
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2024 1:27 am
Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?
This matches what I've seen too.
Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself.
Building > buying.
-
ethan_fisc
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:36 am
Re: Tendon-driven vs direct-actuated fingers - reliability in practice?
@camila.jackson0 This is a great summary, thanks.
Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects.