How much manipulation is really teleoperated behind the scenes right now, honestly?
-
servoken70
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2024 5:05 am
Re: How much manipulation is really teleoperated behind the scenes right now, honestly?
@rossi30 Here's the relevant bit as far as I understand it:
Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
-
mohammed64
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:56 am
Re: How much manipulation is really teleoperated behind the scenes right now, honestly?
Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
Re: How much manipulation is really teleoperated behind the scenes right now, honestly?
@mohammed64 Just to be precise about one thing:
Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
-
zoeanderson
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2024 2:39 am
Re: How much manipulation is really teleoperated behind the scenes right now, honestly?
@james15 Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well.
Payload-to-hand-weight ratio varies a lot across current dexterous hands, and it's a meaningful tradeoff - more DoF and finer sensing generally means more actuators and mass in the hand itself, which eats into the arm's usable payload budget. In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
Re: How much manipulation is really teleoperated behind the scenes right now, honestly?
@zoeanderson Agreed, and I'd add:
Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence.
Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
Re: How much manipulation is really teleoperated behind the scenes right now, honestly?
Thanks for laying this out, genuinely useful.
Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
Re: How much manipulation is really teleoperated behind the scenes right now, honestly?
Just to be precise about one thing:
In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.