Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?

Battery chemistry, pack design, BMS, runtime, charging/swapping, and keeping actuators from cooking themselves.
ethan17
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 8:21 pm

Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?

Post by ethan17 »

This raises a question for me - Tesla's Optimus Gen 2 reportedly carries roughly a 2.3 kWh pack and manages about two hours of dynamic work, while Unitree's H1 runs a smaller 0.864 kWh pack good for under four hours of largely static operation - a useful illustration of how battery size and workload type both drive runtime.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
gimbalmar65
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2025 4:14 am

Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?

Post by gimbalmar65 »

@ethan17 I can speak to this a bit. There's no widely standardized safety certification specific to humanoid battery packs yet in most jurisdictions - deployments generally lean on adapted versions of existing standards for industrial battery systems and electrical safety rather than a purpose-built humanoid standard.
Currently: 3D printing my way to bankruptcy.
karen.chen3
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2025 1:30 pm

Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?

Post by karen.chen3 »

@gimbalmar65 Can I ask a dumb follow-up - There's no widely standardized safety certification specific to humanoid battery packs yet in most jurisdictions - deployments generally lean on adapted versions of existing standards for industrial battery systems and electrical safety rather than a purpose-built humanoid standard. Best-in-class lithium-ion cells used in humanoids are currently landing around 280-300 Wh/kg, which is respectable but still leaves battery mass as one of the largest single contributors to total robot weight.
they/them
tariqlarsen
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:28 pm

Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?

Post by tariqlarsen »

@karen.chen3 This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for. Regenerative braking on humanoid joints can recover some energy during deceleration phases of walking, but the actual energy recovered is modest compared to a vehicle, since humanoid joints don't sustain the same continuous high-speed rotation that makes regen worthwhile in EVs.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
ethan17
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 8:21 pm

Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?

Post by ethan17 »

Follow-up question though - Hot-swappable battery packs solve the runtime bottleneck for continuous operations (like a 24/7 warehouse shift) without needing a much bigger, heavier pack, but they add mechanical complexity, a failure-prone connector interface, and logistics overhead for managing spare packs. There's no widely standardized safety certification specific to humanoid battery packs yet in most jurisdictions - deployments generally lean on adapted versions of existing standards for industrial battery systems and electrical safety rather than a purpose-built humanoid standard.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
servoken70
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2024 5:05 am

Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?

Post by servoken70 »

This is a great summary, thanks. Tesla's Optimus Gen 2 reportedly carries roughly a 2.3 kWh pack and manages about two hours of dynamic work, while Unitree's H1 runs a smaller 0.864 kWh pack good for under four hours of largely static operation - a useful illustration of how battery size and workload type both drive runtime. Idle/standing power draw is often surprisingly close to a meaningful fraction of active walking power draw once you account for onboard compute, sensors, and balance-holding torque - 'doing nothing' still costs real energy on a humanoid.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
nicole57
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:29 am

Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?

Post by nicole57 »

@servoken70 Small correction on one detail: Battery placement (torso-centered vs backpack vs distributed through the limbs) is a real tradeoff between center-of-mass/balance considerations and thermal/cooling access - a torso-centered pack helps balance but is harder to cool than a more exposed backpack placement.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
dubois35
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2024 12:01 pm

Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?

Post by dubois35 »

@nicole57 That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. There's no widely standardized safety certification specific to humanoid battery packs yet in most jurisdictions - deployments generally lean on adapted versions of existing standards for industrial battery systems and electrical safety rather than a purpose-built humanoid standard.
they/them
larrysokolov
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2025 4:23 pm

Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?

Post by larrysokolov »

@dubois35 +1 to this. Worth adding: Higher-voltage power architectures reduce resistive losses and current draw through the wiring harness for a given power level, which is part of why some newer platforms are moving away from lower-voltage packs as total system power demand climbs. Thermal margin in a densely packed humanoid chassis is often the real limiting factor on sustained performance, not raw motor power - actuators get thermally throttled well before they'd hit their absolute torque limits, especially during repeated high-load cycles like continuous lifting.
he/him
scott21
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:57 am

Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?

Post by scott21 »

@larrysokolov One nitpick - Best-in-class lithium-ion cells used in humanoids are currently landing around 280-300 Wh/kg, which is respectable but still leaves battery mass as one of the largest single contributors to total robot weight.
she/her
Post Reply