Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?
Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?
This raises a question for me -
Tesla's Optimus Gen 2 reportedly carries roughly a 2.3 kWh pack and manages about two hours of dynamic work, while Unitree's H1 runs a smaller 0.864 kWh pack good for under four hours of largely static operation - a useful illustration of how battery size and workload type both drive runtime.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
-
gimbalmar65
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2025 4:14 am
Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?
@ethan17 I can speak to this a bit.
There's no widely standardized safety certification specific to humanoid battery packs yet in most jurisdictions - deployments generally lean on adapted versions of existing standards for industrial battery systems and electrical safety rather than a purpose-built humanoid standard.
Currently: 3D printing my way to bankruptcy.
-
karen.chen3
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2025 1:30 pm
Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?
@gimbalmar65 Can I ask a dumb follow-up -
There's no widely standardized safety certification specific to humanoid battery packs yet in most jurisdictions - deployments generally lean on adapted versions of existing standards for industrial battery systems and electrical safety rather than a purpose-built humanoid standard. Best-in-class lithium-ion cells used in humanoids are currently landing around 280-300 Wh/kg, which is respectable but still leaves battery mass as one of the largest single contributors to total robot weight.
they/them
-
tariqlarsen
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:28 pm
Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?
@karen.chen3 This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for.
Regenerative braking on humanoid joints can recover some energy during deceleration phases of walking, but the actual energy recovered is modest compared to a vehicle, since humanoid joints don't sustain the same continuous high-speed rotation that makes regen worthwhile in EVs.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?
Follow-up question though -
Hot-swappable battery packs solve the runtime bottleneck for continuous operations (like a 24/7 warehouse shift) without needing a much bigger, heavier pack, but they add mechanical complexity, a failure-prone connector interface, and logistics overhead for managing spare packs. There's no widely standardized safety certification specific to humanoid battery packs yet in most jurisdictions - deployments generally lean on adapted versions of existing standards for industrial battery systems and electrical safety rather than a purpose-built humanoid standard.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
-
servoken70
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2024 5:05 am
Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?
This is a great summary, thanks.
Tesla's Optimus Gen 2 reportedly carries roughly a 2.3 kWh pack and manages about two hours of dynamic work, while Unitree's H1 runs a smaller 0.864 kWh pack good for under four hours of largely static operation - a useful illustration of how battery size and workload type both drive runtime. Idle/standing power draw is often surprisingly close to a meaningful fraction of active walking power draw once you account for onboard compute, sensors, and balance-holding torque - 'doing nothing' still costs real energy on a humanoid.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?
@servoken70 Small correction on one detail:
Battery placement (torso-centered vs backpack vs distributed through the limbs) is a real tradeoff between center-of-mass/balance considerations and thermal/cooling access - a torso-centered pack helps balance but is harder to cool than a more exposed backpack placement.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?
@nicole57 That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit.
There's no widely standardized safety certification specific to humanoid battery packs yet in most jurisdictions - deployments generally lean on adapted versions of existing standards for industrial battery systems and electrical safety rather than a purpose-built humanoid standard.
they/them
-
larrysokolov
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2025 4:23 pm
Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?
@dubois35 +1 to this. Worth adding:
Higher-voltage power architectures reduce resistive losses and current draw through the wiring harness for a given power level, which is part of why some newer platforms are moving away from lower-voltage packs as total system power demand climbs. Thermal margin in a densely packed humanoid chassis is often the real limiting factor on sustained performance, not raw motor power - actuators get thermally throttled well before they'd hit their absolute torque limits, especially during repeated high-load cycles like continuous lifting.
he/him
Re: Higher-voltage platforms - why are some companies moving away from low-voltage packs?
@larrysokolov One nitpick -
Best-in-class lithium-ion cells used in humanoids are currently landing around 280-300 Wh/kg, which is respectable but still leaves battery mass as one of the largest single contributors to total robot weight.
she/her