What CAD software are people actually using for their builds?
-
jonathan_tana
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2026 4:58 pm
Re: What CAD software are people actually using for their builds?
Appreciate the detailed answer.
The Berkeley Humanoid Lite stands about 1 meter tall and weighs roughly 16 kg, which is a genuinely reasonable target size for a first serious hobbyist build - big enough to be a real bipedal platform, small enough to not need industrial-scale actuators or a huge budget.
Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
she/her
Re: What CAD software are people actually using for their builds?
New to this, so forgive me if this is obvious -
3D-printed gears wearing out is one of the most common early hobbyist failure points - infill percentage, layer orientation relative to load direction, and filament choice (nylon or reinforced composites tend to outlast standard PLA/PETG under repeated gear mesh loading) all matter a lot more than most beginners expect.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
-
barbara_liu
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2026 7:08 am
Re: What CAD software are people actually using for their builds?
Pretty much this. One thing to add:
Jetson-class boards remain a common choice for onboard compute on hobbyist builds needing real vision or learned-policy inference, while a Raspberry Pi is often adequate for lower-level joint control and telemetry if the heavier compute is offloaded to a base station.
they/them
Re: What CAD software are people actually using for their builds?
@barbara_liu Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here.
Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."